use back old action
Some checks failed
Build LaTeX document / build_latex (push) Failing after 3m43s
Some checks failed
Build LaTeX document / build_latex (push) Failing after 3m43s
This commit is contained in:
@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
|
||||
\section{Introduction}\label{sec:introduction}
|
||||
\subsection{Motivation}\label{subsec:motivation}
|
||||
For most supervised learning tasks lots of training samples are essential.
|
||||
With too less training data the model will not generalize well and not fit a real world task.
|
||||
Labeling datasets is commonly seen as an expensive task and wants to be avoided as much as possible.\cite{generalAI}
|
||||
That's why there is a machine-learning field called active learning.
|
||||
The general approach is to train a model that predicts within every iteration a ranking metric or Pseudo-Labels which then can be used to rank the importance of samples to be labeled by an oracle.
|
||||
These labeled samples are then used to train the model.\cite{activelearning}
|
||||
Anomaly detection has especially in the industrial and automotive field essential importance.
|
||||
Lots of assembly lines need visual inspection to find errors often with the help of camera systems.
|
||||
Machine learning helped the field to advance a lot in the past.
|
||||
PatchCore and EfficientAD are algorithms trained only on good data and then detect anomalies.
|
||||
The problem is they need a lot of training data and time to train.
|
||||
Few-Shot learning might be a suitable alternative with essentially lowered train time.
|
||||
|
||||
In this thesis the performance of 3 Few-Shot learning algorithms will be compared in the field of annomaly detection.
|
||||
|
||||
The goal of this practical work is to test active learning within a simple classification task and evaluate its performance.
|
||||
\subsection{Research Questions}\label{subsec:research-questions}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user