add remaining headings and github action workflow

typstalt/conclusionandoutlook.typ

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+= Conclusion and Outlook
+
+== Conclusion
+
+== Outlook

typstalt/experimentalresults.typ

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+= Experimental Results
+
+== Is Few-Shot learning a suitable fit for anomaly detection?
+
+Should Few-Shot learning be used for anomaly detection tasks?
+How does it compare to well established algorithms such as Patchcore or EfficientAD?
+
+== How does disbalancing the Shot number affect performance?
+Does giving the Few-Shot learner more good than bad samples improve the model performance?
+
+== How does the 3 (ResNet, CAML, \pmf) methods perform in only detecting the anomaly class?
+How much does the performance improve if only detecting an anomaly or not?
+How does it compare to PatchCore and EfficientAD?
+
+== Extra: How does Euclidean distance compare to Cosine-similarity when using ResNet as a feature-extractor?

typstalt/implementation.typ

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+= Implementation
+
+== Experiment Setup
+% todo
+todo setup of experiments, which classes used, nr of samples
+kinds of experiments which lead to graphs
+
+== Jupyter
+
+To get accurate performance measures the active-learning process was implemented in a Jupyter notebook first.
+This helps to choose which of the methods performs the best and which one to use in the final Dagster pipeline.
+A straight forward machine-learning pipeline was implemented with the help of Pytorch and RESNet-18.
+
+Moreover, the Dataset was manually imported with the help of a custom torch dataloader and preprocessed with random augmentations.
+After each loop iteration the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was calculated over the validation set to get a performance measure.
+All those AUC were visualized in a line plot, see section~\ref{sec:experimental-results} for the results.

typstalt/introduction.typ

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ How much does the performance improve if only detecting an anomaly or not?
 How does it compare to PatchCore and EfficientAD?
 
 === Extra: How does Euclidean distance compare to Cosine-similarity when using ResNet as a feature-extractor?
-I've tried different distance measures $->$ but results are pretty much the same.
+// I've tried different distance measures $->$ but results are pretty much the same.
 
 == Outline
 todo

typstalt/main.typ

@@ -64,19 +64,15 @@
     v(10mm)
   },
   indent: 2em,
-  depth: 3
+  depth: 2
 )<outline>
 #pagebreak(weak: false)
 
 #include "introduction.typ"
 #include "materialandmethods.typ"
-
-= Section Heading
-#cite(<efficientADpaper>)
-== Subsection Heading
-=== Subsubsection Heading
-==== Paragraph Heading
-===== Subparagraph Heading
+#include "implementation.typ"
+#include "experimentalresults.typ"
+#include "conclusionandoutlook.typ"
 
 #set par(leading: 0.7em, first-line-indent: 0em, justify: true)
 #bibliography("sources.bib", style: "apa")

typstalt/materialandmethods.typ

@@ -7,16 +7,13 @@ MVTec AD is a dataset for benchmarking anomaly detection methods with a focus on
 It contains over 5000 high-resolution images divided into fifteen different object and texture categories.
 Each category comprises a set of defect-free training images and a test set of images with various kinds of defects as well as images without defects.
 
-// todo source for https://www.mvtec.com/company/research/datasets/mvtec-ad
-
-// todo example image
-//\begin{figure}
-//    \centering
-//    \includegraphics[width=\linewidth/2]{../rsc/muffin_chiauaua_poster}
-//    \caption{Sample images from dataset. \cite{muffinsvschiuahuakaggle_poster}}
-//    \label{fig:roc-example}
-//\end{figure}
+#figure(
+  image("rsc/dataset_overview_large.png", width: 80%),
+  caption: [Architecture convolutional neural network. #cite(<datasetsampleimg>)],
+) <datasetoverview>
 
+// todo
+Todo: descibe which categories are used in this bac and how many samples there are.
 
 == Methods
 
@@ -37,9 +34,9 @@ The first and easiest method of this bachelor thesis uses a simple ResNet to cal
 See //%todo link to this section
 // todo proper source
 
-=== Generalisation from few samples}
+=== Generalisation from few samples
 
-=== Patchcore}
+=== Patchcore
 
 %todo also show values how they perform on MVTec AD
 

typstalt/sources.bib

@@ -42,33 +42,41 @@
 	    howpublished = "\url{https://docs.jupyter.org/en/latest/}",
 	    year = {2024},
 	    note = "[Online; accessed 13-May-2024]"
-	}
+}
 
- 	@misc{cnnintro,
-	    title={An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networks},
-	    author={Keiron O'Shea and Ryan Nash},
-	    year={2015},
-	    eprint={1511.08458},
-	    archivePrefix={arXiv},
-	    primaryClass={cs.NE}
-	}
+@misc{cnnintro,
+    title={An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networks},
+    author={Keiron O'Shea and Ryan Nash},
+    year={2015},
+    eprint={1511.08458},
+    archivePrefix={arXiv},
+    primaryClass={cs.NE}
+}
 
- 	@misc{cnnarchitectureimg,
-	    author = {},
-	    title = {{What are convolutional neural networks?}},
-	    howpublished = "\url{https://cointelegraph.com/explained/what-are-convolutional-neural-networks}",
-	    year = {2024},
-	    note = "[Online; accessed 12-April-2024]"
-	}
+@misc{cnnarchitectureimg,
+    author = {},
+    title = {{What are convolutional neural networks?}},
+    howpublished = "\url{https://cointelegraph.com/explained/what-are-convolutional-neural-networks}",
+    year = {2024},
+    note = "[Online; accessed 12-April-2024]"
+}
 
-	 	@inproceedings{liang2017soft,
-	    title={Soft-margin softmax for deep classification},
-	    author={Liang, Xuezhi and Wang, Xiaobo and Lei, Zhen and Liao, Shengcai and Li, Stan Z},
-	    booktitle={International Conference on Neural Information Processing},
-	    pages={413--421},
-	    year={2017},
-	    organization={Springer}
-	}
+@misc{datasetsampleimg,
+    author = {},
+    title = {{The MVTec anomaly detection dataset (MVTec AD)}},
+    howpublished = "\url{https://www.mvtec.com/company/research/datasets/mvtec-ad}",
+    year = {2024},
+    note = "[Online; accessed 12-April-2024]"
+}
+
+@inproceedings{liang2017soft,
+    title={Soft-margin softmax for deep classification},
+    author={Liang, Xuezhi and Wang, Xiaobo and Lei, Zhen and Liao, Shengcai and Li, Stan Z},
+    booktitle={International Conference on Neural Information Processing},
+    pages={413--421},
+    year={2017},
+    organization={Springer}
+}
 
 @inbook{Boltzmann,
 	    place = {Cambridge},
@@ -82,11 +90,11 @@
     pages = {49–96},
     collection = {Cambridge Library Collection - Physical  Sciences}, key = {value},}
 
- 	@misc{resnet,
-	    title={Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition},
-	    author={Kaiming He and Xiangyu Zhang and Shaoqing Ren and Jian Sun},
-	    year={2015},
-	    eprint={1512.03385},
-	    archivePrefix={arXiv},
-	    primaryClass={cs.CV}
-	}
+@misc{resnet,
+    title={Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition},
+    author={Kaiming He and Xiangyu Zhang and Shaoqing Ren and Jian Sun},
+    year={2015},
+    eprint={1512.03385},
+    archivePrefix={arXiv},
+    primaryClass={cs.CV}
+}