This commit is contained in:
		@@ -18,12 +18,12 @@ How does it compare to well established algorithms such as Patchcore or Efficien
 | 
			
		||||
\subsubsection{How does disbalancing the Shot number affect performance?}
 | 
			
		||||
Does giving the Few-Shot learner more good than bad samples improve the model performance?
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
\subsubsection{How does the 3 methods perform in only detecting the anomaly class?}
 | 
			
		||||
\subsubsection{How does the 3 (ResNet, CAML, \pmf) methods perform in only detecting the anomaly class?}
 | 
			
		||||
How much does the performance improve if only detecting an anomaly or not?
 | 
			
		||||
How does it compare to PatchCore and EfficientAD?
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
\subsubsection{Extra: How does Euclidean distance compare to Cosine-similarity when using ResNet as a feature-extractor?}
 | 
			
		||||
I've tried different distance measures -> but results are pretty much the same.
 | 
			
		||||
I've tried different distance measures $\rightarrow$ but results are pretty much the same.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
\subsection{Outline}\label{subsec:outline}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 
 | 
			
		||||
@@ -52,6 +52,10 @@
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
\lstset{style=mystyle}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
\newcommand{\pmf}{$P{>}M{>}F$}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
%\lstset{basicstyle=\ttfamily, keywordstyle=\bfseries}
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
\if\ieee1
 | 
			
		||||
 
 | 
			
		||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user